« Libre accès: réflexions sur les "mandats" | Page d'accueil | ERMS: SemperTool »
lundi, 06 juillet 2009
DI: "Making largely empty repositories "larger" (by "networking" them) is as futile as "making their infrastructure more robust": What repositories lack and need is their target content."
S. Harnard répond aux auteurs de l'article: Beyond Institutional Repositories.
(1) Repository size and "infrastructure" do not generate content.
(2) Empty repositories are useless.
(3) The only way to fill them is to mandate deposit.
(4) Not all or most research is funded.
(5) But all research originates from institutions.
(6) Institutions' interests are served by hosting and managing their own research assets.
(7) Hence both institutional and funder mandates should converge on institutional deposit.
(8) Any central collections can then be harvested from the global distributed of institutional repositories.
08:29 Publié dans Dépôts institutionnels | Lien permanent | Commentaires (0) | Envoyer cette note
| 
| 
del.icio.us
|
| 
Facebook
Trackbacks
Voici l'URL pour faire un trackback sur cette note : http://pintini.blogspirit.com/trackback/1790165