Au menu du vol. 8 (juin 2008) d'Ethics In Science And Enviromental Politics (ESEP, éd. Inter Research):

The Use And Misuse Of Bibliometric Indices In Evaluating Scholarly Performance

- Introduction. Factors and indices are one thing, deciding who is scholarly, why they are scholarly, and the relative value of their scholarship is something else entirely

- Escape from the impact factor

- Lost in publication: how measurement harms science

- Hidden dangers of a ‘citation culture’

- The siege of science

- The economics of post-doc publishing

- Chasing after the high impact

- Challenges for scientometric indicators: data demining, knowledge flows measurements and diversity issues

- Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis

- Re-interpretation of ‘influence weight’ as a citation-based Index of New Knowledge (INK)

- Benefitting from bibliometry

- Using a balanced approach to bibliometrics: quantitative performance measures in the Australian Research Quality Framework + Erratum

- Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results

- Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings

Via liste Dig_Lib